Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 14:20:12 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank1378
Score99.490.676.857.8
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.98%99.92%99.92%73.97%
p50 latency19.2 ms33.9 ms120.8 ms2024.4 ms
p95 latency34.1 ms71.9 ms211.6 ms6590.4 ms
p99 latency77.0 ms172.2 ms233.6 ms9196.2 ms
Correctness100.00%99.99%100.00%96.63%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.37 blocks0.40 blocks0.95 blocks
Rate limited014736,482
Unsupported0000
Samples37,76037,18937,7377,789

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+8.8points

  • Latency+9.0
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +8.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+22.6points

  • Latency+22.7
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +22.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+41.6points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+10.4
  • Correctness+0.7
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +41.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time