Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 04:42:43 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | dRPC | MEV Blocker |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| Score | 99.2 | 91.0 | 77.0 |
| Status | Excellent | Excellent | Good |
| Availability | 99.98% | 99.92% | 99.91% |
| p50 latency | 19.6 ms | 34.1 ms | 119.6 ms |
| p95 latency | 36.2 ms | 70.0 ms | 210.4 ms |
| p99 latency | 173.0 ms | 172.7 ms | 234.1 ms |
| Correctness | 99.99% | 99.99% | 99.99% |
| Head lag | 0.50 blocks | 0.38 blocks | 0.39 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 132 | 2 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Samples | 38,393 | 37,784 | 38,340 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsdRPC
+8.2points
- Latency+8.3
- Head freshness−0.1
- Availability+0.0
- Correctness−0.0
The parts add to +8.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
TenderlyvsMEV Blocker
+22.1points
- Latency+22.2
- Head freshness−0.1
- Availability+0.0
- Correctness−0.0
The parts add to +22.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.