Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 15:04:03 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodedRPC1RPC
Rank1238
Score99.498.590.757.8
StatusExcellentExcellentExcellentDegraded
Availability99.98%99.97%99.93%73.97%
p50 latency19.2 ms19.7 ms33.9 ms2024.4 ms
p95 latency34.2 ms38.5 ms71.6 ms6590.4 ms
p99 latency76.8 ms91.6 ms172.2 ms9196.2 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%99.99%96.63%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.49 blocks0.37 blocks0.95 blocks
Rate limited001436,411
Unsupported0000
Samples37,32637,68536,7517,706

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+0.9points

  • Latency+0.9
  • Availability+0.0
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +0.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+8.7points

  • Latency+8.8
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +8.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+41.6points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+10.4
  • Correctness+0.7
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +41.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time