Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.9 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 18:58:24 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyMerkle1RPCCloudflare
Rank2689
Score96.978.462.454.2
StatusExcellentGoodDegradedDegraded
Availability99.96%99.98%84.99%23.11%
p50 latency19.8 ms106.9 ms225.7 ms15.3 ms
p95 latency49.6 ms195.7 ms4391.3 ms89.3 ms
p99 latency731.1 ms243.0 ms7602.5 ms253.0 ms
Correctness99.99%100.00%97.48%100.00%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.48 blocks0.91 blocksno cohort
Rate limited018,27719,57096
Unsupported022303,351
Samples113,92726,39523,825113,740

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+18.5points

  • Latency+18.5
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +18.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+34.5points

  • Latency+27.5
  • Availability+6.0
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +34.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsCloudflare

+42.6points

  • Availability+29.7
  • Head freshness*+9.4
  • Latency+5.7
  • Correctness2.2

The parts add to +42.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.

Latency over time