Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 17:58:20 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyNodeRealMerkleMEV Blocker
Rank1467
Score99.482.970.869.5
StatusExcellentGoodDegradedDegraded
Availability99.98%100.00%100.00%99.90%
p50 latency20.3 ms87.5 ms110.7 ms125.1 ms
p95 latency33.4 ms99.5 ms191.8 ms217.4 ms
p99 latency65.1 ms127.5 ms235.0 ms241.7 ms
Correctness99.99%100.00%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.33 blocks0.56 blocks0.40 blocks
Rate limited001,5280
Unsupported00200
Samples9,6849,5142,2539,640

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+16.5points

  • Latency+16.7
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +16.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+28.6points

  • Latency+28.5
  • Head freshness+0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +28.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+29.9points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +29.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time