Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.6 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 10:49:50 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeTenderlyMerkleMEV Blocker
Rank1267
Score99.495.478.677.7
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodGood
Availability99.97%99.96%99.98%99.89%
p50 latency18.5 ms19.8 ms106.4 ms118.6 ms
p95 latency33.7 ms57.5 ms195.9 ms209.3 ms
p99 latency71.3 ms805.7 ms243.2 ms232.7 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%100.00%99.99%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.50 blocks0.48 blocks0.40 blocks
Rate limited0016,1983
Unsupported001980
Samples101,486100,71023,333100,530

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsTenderly

+3.9points

  • Latency+3.9
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +3.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsMerkle

+20.8points

  • Latency+20.8
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Correctness0.0
  • Availability0.0

The parts add to +20.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsMEV Blocker

+21.7points

  • Latency+21.7
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +21.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time