Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 17:52:11 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodeMerkleMEV Blocker
Rank1267
Score99.494.970.869.5
StatusExcellentExcellentDegradedDegraded
Availability99.98%100.00%100.00%99.89%
p50 latency20.2 ms25.5 ms110.7 ms125.1 ms
p95 latency33.4 ms50.5 ms191.8 ms217.5 ms
p99 latency65.4 ms113.1 ms235.0 ms242.3 ms
Correctness99.99%100.00%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.48 blocks0.55 blocks0.40 blocks
Rate limited001,5100
Unsupported00200
Samples9,5209,5882,2249,479

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+4.5points

  • Latency+4.5
  • Availability0.0
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +4.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+28.6points

  • Latency+28.5
  • Head freshness+0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +28.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+29.9points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +29.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time