Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 07:27:43 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCNodeRealMerkle
Rank2346
Score98.587.979.970.0
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability100.00%99.95%100.00%100.00%
p50 latency18.4 ms31.3 ms87.4 ms105.1 ms
p95 latency32.0 ms63.1 ms105.2 ms193.2 ms
p99 latency68.3 ms157.1 ms141.9 ms268.8 ms
Correctness100.00%99.99%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.48 blocks0.37 blocks0.35 blocks0.59 blocks
Rate limited03401,395
Unsupported00015
Samples8,8408,6928,7181,970

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+10.6points

  • Latency+10.7
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +10.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+18.7points

  • Latency+18.8
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +18.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+28.5points

  • Latency+28.4
  • Head freshness+0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +28.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time