Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.7 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 13:42:44 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCNodeRealMerkle
Rank2346
Score96.092.387.878.5
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodGood
Availability99.96%99.93%99.82%99.98%
p50 latency19.8 ms33.8 ms87.4 ms106.6 ms
p95 latency54.4 ms71.9 ms100.0 ms196.2 ms
p99 latency780.4 ms168.2 ms125.7 ms243.3 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%100.00%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.36 blocks0.35 blocks0.48 blocks
Rate limited0641016,926
Unsupported000205
Samples105,399103,656103,62224,409

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+3.6points

  • Latency+3.8
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +3.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+8.2points

  • Latency+8.3
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.1
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +8.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+17.4points

  • Latency+17.5
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +17.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time