Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.7 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 12:22:33 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyNodeRealMerkleMEV Blocker
Rank2467
Score95.787.978.677.7
StatusExcellentGoodGoodGood
Availability99.96%99.82%99.98%99.89%
p50 latency19.8 ms87.4 ms106.5 ms118.7 ms
p95 latency55.9 ms100.1 ms196.1 ms209.5 ms
p99 latency793.0 ms125.8 ms243.4 ms232.9 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%100.00%99.99%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.35 blocks0.48 blocks0.40 blocks
Rate limited0016,5943
Unsupported002010
Samples103,225101,48723,904103,041

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+7.9points

  • Latency+8.0
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.1
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +7.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+17.2points

  • Latency+17.2
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +17.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+18.0points

  • Latency+18.1
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +18.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time