Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
30d window · 2.1 days observed · generated 2026-08-26 22:25:28 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | Merkle |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | 3 | 6 |
| Score | 91.2 | 78.7 |
| Status | Excellent | Good |
| Availability | 99.96% | 99.98% |
| p50 latency | 20.0 ms | 106.7 ms |
| p95 latency | 84.8 ms | 196.4 ms |
| p99 latency | 914.7 ms | 244.4 ms |
| Correctness | 99.99% | 100.00% |
| Head lag | 0.51 blocks | 0.46 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 13,009 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 159 |
| Samples | 80,647 | 18,747 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsMerkle
+12.6points
- Latency+12.6
- Head freshness−0.1
- Availability−0.0
- Correctness−0.0
The parts add to +12.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.