Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
7d window · 3.0 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 21:02:16 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | MEV Blocker | Cloudflare |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 2 | 7 | 9 |
| Score | 97.2 | 77.4 | 54.1 |
| Status | Excellent | Good | Degraded |
| Availability | 99.97% | 99.89% | 23.11% |
| p50 latency | 19.8 ms | 119.4 ms | 15.4 ms |
| p95 latency | 48.2 ms | 210.6 ms | 89.5 ms |
| p99 latency | 716.5 ms | 234.2 ms | 253.6 ms |
| Correctness | 99.99% | 99.99% | 100.00% |
| Head lag | 0.50 blocks | 0.40 blocks | no cohort |
| Rate limited | 0 | 3 | 96 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 | 3,450 |
| Samples | 117,262 | 117,063 | 117,089 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsMEV Blocker
+19.7points
- Latency+19.8
- Head freshness−0.1
- Availability+0.0
- Correctness+0.0
The parts add to +19.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
TenderlyvsCloudflare
+43.0points
- Availability+29.7
- Head freshness*+9.4
- Latency+6.2
- Correctness−2.2
The parts add to +43.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.