Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.8 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 16:07:55 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeTenderlyMerkleMEV Blocker
Rank1267
Score99.496.478.577.6
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodGood
Availability99.98%99.96%99.98%99.89%
p50 latency19.0 ms19.8 ms106.7 ms119.0 ms
p95 latency34.9 ms51.9 ms196.0 ms210.0 ms
p99 latency74.4 ms758.7 ms243.3 ms233.8 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%100.00%99.99%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.50 blocks0.48 blocks0.40 blocks
Rate limited0017,5683
Unsupported002160
Samples110,158109,32025,325109,119

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsTenderly

+3.0points

  • Latency+3.0
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +3.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsMerkle

+20.9points

  • Latency+21.0
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +20.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsMEV Blocker

+21.8points

  • Latency+21.9
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +21.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time