Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.8 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 14:56:49 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCNodeRealMerkle
Rank2346
Score96.292.287.778.5
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodGood
Availability99.96%99.93%99.83%99.98%
p50 latency19.8 ms33.8 ms87.4 ms106.7 ms
p95 latency53.0 ms71.9 ms100.0 ms195.8 ms
p99 latency769.7 ms169.0 ms126.0 ms243.3 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%100.00%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.36 blocks0.35 blocks0.48 blocks
Rate limited0644017,239
Unsupported000209
Samples107,394105,629105,58424,857

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+4.0points

  • Latency+4.2
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +4.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+8.5points

  • Latency+8.6
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.1
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +8.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+17.7points

  • Latency+17.8
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +17.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time