Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.4 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 07:21:19 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeTenderlydRPCNodeReal
Rank1234
Score99.494.992.988.2
StatusExcellentExcellentExcellentGood
Availability99.97%99.97%99.93%99.80%
p50 latency18.2 ms19.8 ms33.8 ms87.4 ms
p95 latency33.5 ms61.1 ms71.8 ms100.1 ms
p99 latency69.7 ms826.2 ms167.3 ms125.9 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%99.99%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.50 blocks0.36 blocks0.35 blocks
Rate limited005950
Unsupported0000
Samples95,82195,09393,52093,489

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsTenderly

+4.4points

  • Latency+4.4
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +4.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsdRPC

+6.5points

  • Latency+6.7
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +6.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsNodeReal

+11.2points

  • Latency+11.3
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.1
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +11.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time