Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 13:42:10 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodeNodeRealMerkle
Rank1246
Score99.496.382.870.2
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.95%99.98%100.00%100.00%
p50 latency20.1 ms23.7 ms87.8 ms108.8 ms
p95 latency34.9 ms46.0 ms99.6 ms200.3 ms
p99 latency96.9 ms124.2 ms123.7 ms230.9 ms
Correctness100.00%99.99%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.48 blocks0.49 blocks0.34 blocks0.48 blocks
Rate limited0001,452
Unsupported00018
Samples9,2409,3249,0862,172

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+3.1points

  • Latency+3.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +3.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+16.6points

  • Latency+16.8
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +16.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+29.2points

  • Latency+29.2
  • Availability0.0
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +29.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time