Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
30d window · 2.7 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 13:42:26 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | NodeReal | MEV Blocker |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Score | 96.0 | 87.8 | 77.7 |
| Status | Excellent | Good | Good |
| Availability | 99.96% | 99.82% | 99.89% |
| p50 latency | 19.8 ms | 87.4 ms | 118.8 ms |
| p95 latency | 54.4 ms | 100.0 ms | 209.7 ms |
| p99 latency | 780.4 ms | 125.7 ms | 233.0 ms |
| Correctness | 99.99% | 99.99% | 99.99% |
| Head lag | 0.50 blocks | 0.35 blocks | 0.40 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Samples | 105,388 | 103,615 | 105,188 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsNodeReal
+8.2points
- Latency+8.3
- Head freshness−0.2
- Availability+0.1
- Correctness−0.0
The parts add to +8.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
TenderlyvsMEV Blocker
+18.3points
- Latency+18.4
- Head freshness−0.1
- Availability+0.0
- Correctness+0.0
The parts add to +18.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.