Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.8 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 15:19:25 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyBlast APIMerkle1RPC
Rank2568
Score96.384.978.562.4
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.96%99.98%99.98%84.99%
p50 latency19.8 ms104.9 ms106.7 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency52.6 ms122.4 ms195.8 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency766.0 ms146.7 ms243.2 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%100.00%97.48%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.42 blocks0.48 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited01,16717,33818,544
Unsupported002100
Samples108,010107,44024,98822,654

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsBlast API

+11.4points

  • Latency+11.5
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +11.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+17.8points

  • Latency+17.8
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +17.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+33.9points

  • Latency+26.9
  • Availability+6.0
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +33.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time