Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.5 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 09:43:37 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyBlast APIMerkle1RPC
Rank2568
Score95.385.378.662.5
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.96%99.98%99.98%85.27%
p50 latency19.8 ms104.6 ms106.4 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency58.8 ms122.0 ms196.0 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency813.4 ms145.2 ms243.1 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%100.00%97.48%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.42 blocks0.48 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited01,11315,89016,979
Unsupported001970
Samples98,92498,37622,87720,856

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsBlast API

+10.0points

  • Latency+10.1
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +10.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+16.6points

  • Latency+16.6
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +16.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+32.7points

  • Latency+25.9
  • Availability+5.9
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +32.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time