Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.8 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 16:06:29 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeTenderlyMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank1278
Score99.496.477.662.4
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.98%99.96%99.89%84.99%
p50 latency19.0 ms19.8 ms119.0 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency34.9 ms52.0 ms210.0 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency74.4 ms759.0 ms233.8 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%97.48%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.50 blocks0.40 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited00318,766
Unsupported0000
Samples110,123109,281109,07322,906

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsTenderly

+3.0points

  • Latency+3.0
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +3.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsMEV Blocker

+21.8points

  • Latency+21.9
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +21.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevs1RPC

+37.0points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+6.0
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +37.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time