Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 10:06:19 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodedRPCBlast API
Rank1235
Score99.499.187.878.2
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodGood
Availability99.93%99.98%99.94%99.99%
p50 latency19.1 ms20.0 ms32.0 ms105.6 ms
p95 latency34.1 ms35.1 ms69.3 ms121.9 ms
p99 latency138.3 ms84.9 ms160.5 ms150.6 ms
Correctness100.00%99.99%99.99%99.99%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.49 blocks0.35 blocks0.41 blocks
Rate limited0037132
Unsupported0000
Samples8,2568,3248,1288,251

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+0.3points

  • Latency+0.3
  • Availability0.0
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +0.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+11.6points

  • Latency+11.7
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +11.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsBlast API

+21.1points

  • Latency+21.2
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +21.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time