Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Solana
Side by side
30d window · 30.0 days observed · generated 2026-10-08 17:59:44 UTC
| Metric | PublicNode | Solana Foundation |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | 1 | 3 |
| Score | 92.6 | 69.9 |
| Status | Excellent | Degraded |
| Availability | 99.19% | 99.84% |
| p50 latency | 22.8 ms | 15.9 ms |
| p95 latency | 50.8 ms | 258.2 ms |
| p99 latency | 232.6 ms | 942.0 ms |
| Correctness | 99.25% | 100.00% |
| Head lag | 9.52 blocks | 0.03 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 0 |
| Unsupported | 2,304 | 2,251 |
| Samples | 1,325,009 | 1,008,660 |
3 providers scored against each other. A cohort this small makes every rank a comparison between very few alternatives: first of 3 is a weaker claim than the same score on a crowded chain, and the score is relative to whoever is here.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.
PublicNodevsSolana Foundation
+22.7points
- Latency+30.0
- Head freshness−6.9
- Availability−0.3
- Correctness−0.2
The parts add to +22.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.