Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Solana
Side by side
6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-10-08 17:59:30 UTC
| Metric | PublicNode | Solana Foundation |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | 1 | 2 |
| Score | 92.8 | 86.8 |
| Status | Excellent | Good |
| Availability | 99.25% | 99.95% |
| p50 latency | 29.1 ms | 14.6 ms |
| p95 latency | 53.1 ms | 73.1 ms |
| p99 latency | 145.8 ms | 141.1 ms |
| Correctness | 99.25% | 100.00% |
| Head lag | 8.96 blocks | 0.02 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 0 |
| Unsupported | 55 | 48 |
| Samples | 11,130 | 8,433 |
3 providers scored against each other. A cohort this small makes every rank a comparison between very few alternatives: first of 3 is a weaker claim than the same score on a crowded chain, and the score is relative to whoever is here.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.
PublicNodevsSolana Foundation
+6.0points
- Latency+13.1
- Head freshness−6.7
- Availability−0.3
- Correctness−0.1
The parts add to +6.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.