Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Solana
Side by side
7d window · 7.0 days observed · generated 2026-10-08 17:59:39 UTC
| Metric | PublicNode | Solana Foundation |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | 1 | 2 |
| Score | 93.1 | 84.5 |
| Status | Excellent | Good |
| Availability | 99.36% | 99.96% |
| p50 latency | 23.6 ms | 14.3 ms |
| p95 latency | 50.3 ms | 69.7 ms |
| p99 latency | 165.3 ms | 115.3 ms |
| Correctness | 99.37% | 100.00% |
| Head lag | 8.41 blocks | 0.02 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 0 |
| Unsupported | 938 | 896 |
| Samples | 300,858 | 228,942 |
3 providers scored against each other. A cohort this small makes every rank a comparison between very few alternatives: first of 3 is a weaker claim than the same score on a crowded chain, and the score is relative to whoever is here.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.
PublicNodevsSolana Foundation
+8.6points
- Latency+15.4
- Head freshness−6.5
- Availability−0.2
- Correctness−0.1
The parts add to +8.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.