Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Solana
Side by side
1h window · 60 minutes observed · generated 2026-10-08 18:13:49 UTC
| Metric | PublicNode | Solana Foundation | Tatum |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Score | 92.9 | 84.6 | 64.3 |
| Status | Excellent | Good | Degraded |
| Availability | 99.24% | 100.00% | 99.54% |
| p50 latency | 28.6 ms | 14.8 ms | 29.5 ms |
| p95 latency | 55.1 ms | 78.9 ms | 109.9 ms |
| p99 latency | 172.6 ms | 141.2 ms | 161.3 ms |
| Correctness | 99.24% | 100.00% | 99.54% |
| Head lag | 8.76 blocks | 0.03 blocks | 6.18 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 0 | 45 |
| Unsupported | 8 | 6 | 0 |
| Samples | 1,860 | 1,396 | 571 |
3 providers scored against each other. A cohort this small makes every rank a comparison between very few alternatives: first of 3 is a weaker claim than the same score on a crowded chain, and the score is relative to whoever is here.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.
PublicNodevsSolana Foundation
+8.3points
- Latency+15.3
- Head freshness−6.6
- Availability−0.3
- Correctness−0.2
The parts add to +8.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
PublicNodevsTatum
+28.5points
- Latency+30.0
- Head freshness−1.3
- Availability−0.1
- Correctness−0.1
The parts add to +28.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.