Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Solana
Side by side
7d window · 7.0 days observed · generated 2026-10-08 17:58:53 UTC
| Metric | PublicNode | Tatum |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | 1 | 3 |
| Score | 93.1 | 63.7 |
| Status | Excellent | Degraded |
| Availability | 99.36% | 99.42% |
| p50 latency | 23.6 ms | 27.6 ms |
| p95 latency | 50.3 ms | 93.8 ms |
| p99 latency | 165.3 ms | 192.9 ms |
| Correctness | 99.37% | 99.43% |
| Head lag | 8.41 blocks | 7.18 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 5,949 |
| Unsupported | 938 | 0 |
| Samples | 300,836 | 89,319 |
3 providers scored against each other. A cohort this small makes every rank a comparison between very few alternatives: first of 3 is a weaker claim than the same score on a crowded chain, and the score is relative to whoever is here.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.
PublicNodevsTatum
+29.4points
- Latency+30.0
- Head freshness−0.6
- Availability−0.0
- Correctness−0.0
The parts add to +29.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.