Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Solana
Side by side
6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-10-08 19:23:38 UTC
| Metric | PublicNode | Solana Foundation |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | 1 | 2 |
| Score | 92.6 | 89.4 |
| Status | Excellent | Good |
| Availability | 99.17% | 99.97% |
| p50 latency | 29.2 ms | 14.8 ms |
| p95 latency | 53.5 ms | 73.7 ms |
| p99 latency | 133.4 ms | 138.2 ms |
| Correctness | 99.18% | 100.00% |
| Head lag | 9.27 blocks | 0.01 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 0 |
| Unsupported | 48 | 41 |
| Samples | 10,012 | 7,603 |
3 providers scored against each other. A cohort this small makes every rank a comparison between very few alternatives: first of 3 is a weaker claim than the same score on a crowded chain, and the score is relative to whoever is here.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.
PublicNodevsSolana Foundation
+3.2points
- Latency+10.6
- Head freshness−6.8
- Availability−0.3
- Correctness−0.2
The parts add to +3.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.