Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Solana
Side by side
1h window · 60 minutes observed · generated 2026-10-08 19:23:27 UTC
| Metric | PublicNode | Tatum |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | 2 | 3 |
| Score | 89.0 | 62.9 |
| Status | Good | Degraded |
| Availability | 98.91% | 99.04% |
| p50 latency | 29.6 ms | 34.0 ms |
| p95 latency | 58.2 ms | 167.5 ms |
| p99 latency | 154.8 ms | 369.8 ms |
| Correctness | 98.96% | 99.04% |
| Head lag | 10.01 blocks | 8.56 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 41 |
| Unsupported | 7 | 0 |
| Samples | 1,834 | 560 |
3 providers scored against each other. A cohort this small makes every rank a comparison between very few alternatives: first of 3 is a weaker claim than the same score on a crowded chain, and the score is relative to whoever is here.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.
PublicNodevsTatum
+29.4points
- Latency+30.0
- Head freshness−0.6
- Availability−0.1
- Correctness−0.0
The parts add to +29.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.