Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Solana
Side by side
30d window · 30.0 days observed · generated 2026-10-08 18:21:02 UTC
| Metric | PublicNode | Tatum |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | 1 | 2 |
| Score | 92.6 | 83.4 |
| Status | Excellent | Good |
| Availability | 99.19% | 99.22% |
| p50 latency | 22.8 ms | 26.6 ms |
| p95 latency | 50.8 ms | 88.5 ms |
| p99 latency | 231.6 ms | 238.3 ms |
| Correctness | 99.25% | 99.30% |
| Head lag | 9.52 blocks | 8.10 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 49,879 |
| Unsupported | 2,308 | 0 |
| Samples | 1,325,670 | 440,553 |
3 providers scored against each other. A cohort this small makes every rank a comparison between very few alternatives: first of 3 is a weaker claim than the same score on a crowded chain, and the score is relative to whoever is here.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.
PublicNodevsTatum
+9.2points
- Latency+9.8
- Head freshness−0.6
- Availability−0.0
- Correctness−0.0
The parts add to +9.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.