Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Solana
Side by side
30d window · 30.0 days observed · generated 2026-10-08 18:13:29 UTC
| Metric | Tatum | Solana Foundation |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | 2 | 3 |
| Score | 83.4 | 69.9 |
| Status | Good | Degraded |
| Availability | 99.22% | 99.84% |
| p50 latency | 26.6 ms | 15.9 ms |
| p95 latency | 88.5 ms | 258.2 ms |
| p99 latency | 238.4 ms | 941.9 ms |
| Correctness | 99.30% | 100.00% |
| Head lag | 8.10 blocks | 0.03 blocks |
| Rate limited | 49,874 | 0 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 2,253 |
| Samples | 440,483 | 1,008,986 |
3 providers scored against each other. A cohort this small makes every rank a comparison between very few alternatives: first of 3 is a weaker claim than the same score on a crowded chain, and the score is relative to whoever is here.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tatum, the highest scorer of those selected.
TatumvsSolana Foundation
+13.5points
- Latency+20.2
- Head freshness−6.3
- Availability−0.2
- Correctness−0.1
The parts add to +13.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.