Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Solana
Side by side
7d window · 7.0 days observed · generated 2026-10-08 18:28:14 UTC
| Metric | Solana Foundation | Tatum |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | 2 | 3 |
| Score | 84.5 | 63.7 |
| Status | Good | Degraded |
| Availability | 99.96% | 99.42% |
| p50 latency | 14.3 ms | 27.6 ms |
| p95 latency | 69.7 ms | 93.8 ms |
| p99 latency | 115.3 ms | 192.9 ms |
| Correctness | 100.00% | 99.43% |
| Head lag | 0.02 blocks | 7.17 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 5,960 |
| Unsupported | 899 | 0 |
| Samples | 229,617 | 89,582 |
3 providers scored against each other. A cohort this small makes every rank a comparison between very few alternatives: first of 3 is a weaker claim than the same score on a crowded chain, and the score is relative to whoever is here.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Solana Foundation, the highest scorer of those selected.
Solana FoundationvsTatum
+20.8points
- Latency+14.6
- Head freshness+5.9
- Availability+0.2
- Correctness+0.1
The parts add to +20.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.