Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Solana— showing the top 3 by score. Click to change.
Side by side
1h window · 60 minutes observed · generated 2026-10-08 17:34:36 UTC
| Metric | PublicNode | Solana Foundation | Tatum |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Score | 92.5 | 83.2 | 63.7 |
| Status | Excellent | Good | Degraded |
| Availability | 99.07% | 100.00% | 99.76% |
| p50 latency | 27.7 ms | 14.6 ms | 27.8 ms |
| p95 latency | 51.3 ms | 77.5 ms | 105.9 ms |
| p99 latency | 94.0 ms | 143.1 ms | 236.4 ms |
| Correctness | 99.07% | 100.00% | 99.76% |
| Head lag | 9.47 blocks | 0.02 blocks | 7.56 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 0 | 32 |
| Unsupported | 10 | 4 | 0 |
| Samples | 1,840 | 1,391 | 558 |
3 providers scored against each other. A cohort this small makes every rank a comparison between very few alternatives: first of 3 is a weaker claim than the same score on a crowded chain, and the score is relative to whoever is here.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.
PublicNodevsSolana Foundation
+9.3points
- Latency+16.8
- Head freshness−6.9
- Availability−0.4
- Correctness−0.2
The parts add to +9.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
PublicNodevsTatum
+28.8points
- Latency+30.0
- Head freshness−0.8
- Availability−0.3
- Correctness−0.1
The parts add to +28.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.