Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Solana— showing the top 3 by score. Click to change.
Side by side
6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-10-08 17:34:36 UTC
| Metric | PublicNode | Solana Foundation | Tatum |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Score | 92.8 | 86.9 | 63.6 |
| Status | Excellent | Good | Degraded |
| Availability | 99.26% | 99.95% | 99.44% |
| p50 latency | 29.2 ms | 14.7 ms | 28.2 ms |
| p95 latency | 53.0 ms | 72.5 ms | 107.4 ms |
| p99 latency | 152.7 ms | 138.5 ms | 255.6 ms |
| Correctness | 99.26% | 100.00% | 99.44% |
| Head lag | 9.00 blocks | 0.02 blocks | 7.46 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 0 | 180 |
| Unsupported | 53 | 44 | 0 |
| Samples | 10,354 | 7,848 | 3,064 |
3 providers scored against each other. A cohort this small makes every rank a comparison between very few alternatives: first of 3 is a weaker claim than the same score on a crowded chain, and the score is relative to whoever is here.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.
PublicNodevsSolana Foundation
+5.9points
- Latency+13.1
- Head freshness−6.7
- Availability−0.3
- Correctness−0.1
The parts add to +5.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
PublicNodevsTatum
+29.2points
- Latency+30.0
- Head freshness−0.7
- Availability−0.1
- Correctness−0.0
The parts add to +29.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.