Solana
- of
- 682 validators
- largest holds
- 3.8%
- behaves like
- 103 equal
where the stake sits
One row is one voting validator. Delinquent validators are excluded: they are not currently participating, so they neither secure the chain nor could halt it.
Network
A long validator list is not decentralisation. What matters is how few parties it would take to stop the chain — and on one of these three, a set of 898,811 “validators” comes down to seven.
where the stake sits
One row is one voting validator. Delinquent validators are excluded: they are not currently participating, so they neither secure the chain nor could halt it.
where the stake sits
One row is one elected validator. The registered set is larger, but only the elected 45 produce blocks, and only they could stop.
where the stake sits
One row is one withdrawal address, not one validator. A validator is 32 ETH and a single pool runs hundreds of thousands of them, so counting validators would report this as the most decentralised chain here by a factor of ten thousand — when it is the one where a single party controls the largest share.
Each marker is a measured point: what the top one, five, ten, twenty, fifty and hundred hold between them, and where the whole set reaches 100%. A curve that climbs steeply and flattens early is a chain whose stake sits with a handful of holders. Buckets larger than the set itself are left off rather than drawn at 100%, so no segment claims a measurement it does not have.
The horizontal axis is logarithmic, because these three sets differ by three orders of magnitude and on a linear axis the smallest would be a vertical line at the origin.
Nothing in this table is comparable across chains without reading what each one counts. The column exists for that reason and is never omitted.
None of this is a judgement about any operator. Concentration is a property of where stake has gone, and every delegator who chose the largest validator was making an individually reasonable decision. It is precisely because that decision is reasonable that the aggregate is worth measuring — and why the staking score prices it in rather than recommending the top of the list to everybody. Staking yields
The Nakamoto coefficient is the fewest holders whose combined stake reaches a third — the share at which a party can halt a chain by refusing to participate. Effective holders is the number of equally-sized holders that would produce the same concentration, which is the readable form of the Herfindahl index beside it. Nothing here is comparable across chains without reading the unit each one counts.