Skip to content

Staking

Solana staking

What delegating actually paid, recovered from the rewards the chain issued rather than modelled from an inflation rate. Solana is the one chain measured here where that is possible: it publishes what every validator was paid, every epoch.

What the chain is paying

epoch 1020 · 1 epoch observed

Gross rate, measured

4.71%

Median of every payment the chain made

Gross rate, protocol

—

Needs total supply, which this endpoint will not serve

Total staked

433.44MSOL

Share of supply unavailable

Cluster slots skipped

0.05%

Assigned slots that produced no block

The two gross rates are computed from inputs that share nothing. One is the median of every payment the chain actually made; the other is inflation multiplied by supply and divided by total stake. They agree, and that agreement is what makes either publishable — a single unexplained number would be worth no more here than it is anywhere else.

Rates are annualised at 182.6 epochs a year, from Solana’s 400 ms target slot time. No full epoch has been observed end to end yet; once one has, the measured length replaces the target. Real epochs run slightly longer, so this figure is if anything a little generous.

How the set is actually paid

751 validators

A single network rate says almost nothing about what a delegation pays, because the set it averages over is not shaped like a bell. These are the three distributions the headline hides.

What a delegation earns

Net annual return after commission, in whole per cent. The lowest column holds two different things — validators that pay a little, and validators that take the whole reward — so it is labelled rather than coloured.

01234

net APR, %

What validators charge

Commission is bimodal, not spread: most validators sit at one end or the other, so the average commission describes almost nobody.

01–56–91011–5051–99100

commission, %

Where the stake sits

Cumulative share of stake against validator count. Delegating to a validator already near the top of this curve is what makes it steeper.

a third0%50%100%110100Solana validators: the top 1 hold 3.9%Solana validators: the top 5 hold 15.2%Solana validators: the top 10 hold 23.9%Solana validators: the top 20 hold 34.6%Solana validators: the top 50 hold 54.2%Solana validators: the top 100 hold 71.4%Solana validators: the top 250 hold 87.9%Solana validators: the top 500 hold 97.2%Solana validators: the top 751 hold 100.0%

validators, cumulative

Every validator

6-epoch window

Ordered by what a delegation would have earned, after commission. A validator’s advertised rate is not what it pays: the two things that separate them are the commission they take and the share of their assigned slots they actually produce.

How to read a rate

  • Measured— Recovered from a payment the chain made to this validator
  • Derived— The cohort's measured rate with this validator's commission and block production applied
  • Pays nothing— Commission of 100%: every reward is taken before the delegator sees it

701–750 of 751 validators

Solana validators by measured net annual return
#ValidatorNet APRCommissionStakeScoreStatus
701MARiKM3t7p…R1GS330.00%100%196K0.0Poor
7022dxz129YxB…ueWZV70.00%100%83K0.0Poor
703BaDhUB1eWf…NGZUPy0.00%100%75K0.0Poor
704FoigPJ6kL6…xc1f8H0.00%100%61K0.0Poor
7059U4WqNGVyw…ysaJmg0.00%100%58K0.0Poor
70665pHd5P2Vr…YH7Kg70.00%100%48K0.0Poor
707ark1hdnnfm…DAdABZ0.00%100%42K0.0Poor
708CuStTdKU5n…1G2hTw0.00%100%16K0.0Poor
7095yEnvhM4Ld…xk4cYj0.00%100%14K0.0Poor
7109jxgosAfHg…eynGFP—100%4.61M0.0Poor
7115EhGYUyQNr…vvULeC—100%3.60M0.0Poor
7126y7V8dL673…DqsyrK—100%2.92M0.0Poor
713BSVckjdW2f…xgEdwq—100%2.50M0.0Poor
71476rcGHdPvg…S2TBBJ—100%2.50M0.0Poor
715HpcB5Qg8Y9…bCuKac—100%2.50M0.0Poor
716DUND26mEDf…EWzYw4—100%2.50M0.0Poor
7172GUnfxZavK…CS1rSx—100%2.50M0.0Poor
718Aw5wEMXhby…WPk1ex—100%2.50M0.0Poor
719HnfPZDrbJF…yMCgML—100%2.18M0.0Poor
7206ptuwW4rg5…TGJwWG—100%2.14M0.0Poor
721AEHqTB2RtJ…6kqTBD—100%2.08M0.0Poor
7227QQGNm3ptw…7nwLpE—100%1.88M0.0Poor
7233JotfSFPao…kJNhrt—100%1.84M0.0Poor
724HbidP4hpQd…napD2p—100%1.84M0.0Poor
725GYx8kpp7Ss…ky3YGQ—100%1.44M0.0Poor
726bitHUmbKSQ…duUHfb—100%1.34M0.0Poor
727privaEdSEm…7C5wUM—100%1.32M0.0Poor
728G3a3iYZKNL…DNKkBQ—100%1.32M0.0Poor
7297CR3Jq4ny2…WjAqCT—100%589K0.0Poor
7307S22CYpfBR…E2bYvJ—100%300K0.0Poor
731AHZxzLeRGR…bfEmYR—100%300K0.0Poor
732UZBmptMjMS…FqJcXT—0%25K0.0Poor
7335P35CJVKU1…hHKM7W—100%24K0.0Poor
734STaKesuXJH…HUdvs5—100%18K0.0Poor
735AS4i8EXUZn…43Ds5z—0%10K0.0Poor
736D4KUs6wFY8…mGBt6e—100%8K0.0Poor
737FhFB8MAj5K…eQ1evD—100%00.0Poor
7386DTkuiey2R…h5SkVw—100%89K—Insufficient data
739HDRqPft5io…G843KD—100%71K—Insufficient data
7406mygxmZxmT…c4gyDS—100%2—delinquent
7416adw3JVBUH…kvoz2s—100%2—delinquent
7427Dvp5zCFtV…zUDjTq—100%1—Insufficient data
7434kdjgZKJUw…CNEAc6—100%1—Insufficient data
744C6yZKSQpce…KYRgi4—100%1—delinquent
745CZMekcZwyK…mtinPf—100%1—delinquent
7463BoZ4AF2t7…7U6fjV—100%1—Insufficient data
747CQYPRQ4vqn…L6nMUD—100%1—delinquent
748JDY2ADULVm…3qp8zo—100%1—delinquent
749BAqygpJA82…viJjn9—100%1—delinquent
750AEAJtnjjB1…3tGXbP—100%1—delinquent
Take it awayCSV— Solana staking yieldsJSON— Solana staking yieldsevery validator, not only the filtered view

Rates are annualised from completed epochs. A measured rate is recovered from the payment the chain made to the validator's vote account; a derived rate is the cohort's own measured gross rate with this validator's commission and block production applied, used where no payment can be inverted — at zero commission there is nothing to invert.

How a rate is arrived at

Measured

The chain reports what it paid a validator’s vote account, which is that validator’s commission on its delegators’ rewards — not the rewards themselves. Those are paid straight into individual stake accounts and are not reported anywhere.

So the commission is divided back out. A validator charging 7% that was paid 351 SOL earned its delegators 351 ÷ 0.07 × 0.93 between them.

Derived, and why it is needed

Dividing by zero recovers nothing, and roughly half of Solana’s validators charge no commission at all — so for them there is no payment to invert. The same applies where a validator’s stake has changed so much since it was paid that the two figures no longer describe the same moment.

Those rows use the rate the rest of the cohort was measurably paid, with this validator’s own commission and block production applied — and they say so, on every row.

Neither figure includes MEV. Jito tips are distributed outside the protocol’s own reward mechanism and are not visible in what the chain reports here, so a validator running Jito may pay more than this page shows. It is not estimated here. Full methodology